Competences for Responsible GenAI Use
What employees need to use GenAI knowledgeably, effectively, adaptively, socially appropriately, and ethically.
AI · Work · Organizations
Understanding work in the age of AI.
I study how employees and teams use, adapt to, and collaborate with artificial intelligence, with particular attention to competences for responsible GenAI use and human–AI teams. My work draws on human resource management, organizational behavior, information systems, and the future of work.
NEOMA Business School · Copenhagen Business School
NEOMAResearch Fellow · Lecturer · Ph.D. Candidate (OBHR)
CBSPh.D. Candidate · Management Information Systems
X-CultureCoaching Program Director
Research agenda
Three connected questions.
Capabilities around AI, collaboration with AI, and the organizational consequences that follow.
Human–AI Collaboration
How credibility, trust, coordination, ownership, and team processes change when AI becomes part of collaborative work.
Technology & Future of Work
How emerging technologies reshape learning, work design, employee experiences, and globally distributed collaboration.
Signature research
RGAIC: Competences for Responsible Generative AI Use
The RGAIC framework conceptualizes responsible GenAI use as a multidimensional employee capability spanning cognitive, functional, social, meta, and ethical competences.
Explore the framework →CognitiveFunctionalSocialMetaEthical
Selected scholarship
Recent work.
AOM Proceedings · 2026RGAIC
DOI ↗Employee Competences for Responsible Generative AI Use at Work: A Personal Resource Perspective
Singh, Shirish, Gonzalez-Gomez & Taghavi · Academy of Management Proceedings, 2026(1).
PNAS · 2026
DOI ↗Creating common virtual ground: Protocols to democratize open VR research
Van Zelderen et al., including Singh, D. P. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 123(26), e2524991123.
IJME · 2026
DOI ↗Task-technology fit and the productive use of generative artificial intelligence in student global virtual teams
Farrell, Tavoletti, Singh, Leigh & Taras · The International Journal of Management Education.
Leadership Quarterly · 2025
DOI ↗Perceptions of leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams: Gender, personality, and self-versus peer evaluations
Farrell et al. · The Leadership Quarterly, 101859.
Teaching & academic community
Beyond publications.
Teaching, programme leadership, and building pathways for the next generation of scholars are integral parts of my academic work.
Experiential management education
I teach through global virtual teamwork, real business problems, simulations, structured reflection, and responsible AI use.
Teaching profile →X-Culture Coaching Program
I direct a global coaching community spanning 100+ coaches per semester across 90+ countries, with structured training and programme evaluation.
2025-1 X-Culture Best Professor Award · top-ranked instructor among 197TARA Program
Within X-Culture Coaching, I launched TARA to help future scholars develop research and teaching capabilities through structured training and academic assistantship pathways.
Academic community work →